Moyuka Uchijima vs Nao Hibino Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 26 May at 03:55 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
M. Uchijima vs N. Hibino

JPN
1
Win
Played
1
Win

JPN
1
Win
Played
1
Win
Head-to-head: Uchijima 1 - 1 Hibino
They have played 4 sets in total, with Moyuka Uchijima winning 2 and Nao Hibino winning 2. The last match between Nao Hibino and Moyuka Uchijima was at the French Open - Paris, 27-05-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Nao Hibino getting the victory 6-1 7-5.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Uchijima | 1 |
| Hibino | 1 |
Last 2 H2H Matches:
(R1) French Open - Paris(05-27-25)
(R2) Golden Gate Open - Stanford(08-16-23)
M. Uchijima vs N. Hibino H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $977,216 | Career Prize Money | $1,614,842 |
| 58.44% (263-187) | Career Total W/L | 54.51% (405-338) |
| 0 | Clay | 1 |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 13 | Titles | 13 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 1 |
| 35.00% (14-26) | YTD Win/Loss | 25.00% (2-6) |
M. Uchijima vs N. Hibino Match Preview:
- How do Hibino and Uchijima compare in recent second serve performance? Hibino has won 40.7% of points, while Uchijima has a slight edge with 43.33%.
- Regarding return game stats, Hibino has claimed 50.6% of their opponent's second serve points, with Uchijima slightly better at 51.59%.
- On first serve returns, Hibino has outperformed Uchijima with 35.24% compared to 32.29%.
- When under pressure, Uchijima edges ahead by saving 51.48% of breakpoints, while Hibino has saved 50.16%.
- Hibino has a slight advantage in overall match wins over the past year, securing 48.33% of matches compared to Uchijima's 47.54%.
- Who's better on different surfaces? Hibino excels on Hard courts with a 57% win rate, whereas Uchijima is strongest on Clay with a 69% win rate.
- What about the level of competition? Hibino played primarily on the Main tour with a 50% win record, whereas Uchijima found more success at the Masters series with a win rate of 62.96%.
- In direct head-to-head matches, Uchijima leads with one win over Hibino with no losses.
- In terms of opponents' average ranking, Hibino faced players with an average rank of 158.35, while Uchijima's opponents had an average rank of 116.64.
- If this match goes to a deciding set, Hibino has won 65% of them in the past year, compared to Uchijima's 58% success rate in similar situations.
- Break point opportunities are close, with Hibino converting at 35.85% and Uchijima at 36.12%.
Editorial Prediction (May 26, 2025, UTC):
Based on recent performance metrics, both Hibino and Uchijima have shown comparable skills, with only slight differences in various statistics.
However, Uchijima's slightly better second serve performance and breakpoint-saving ability could give her a crucial advantage, especially in crucial moments of the match.
Notably, Uchijima has previously won their sole head-to-head encounter, adding weight to her potential to emerge victorious again.
Considering these factors, Uchijima is likely to win the upcoming tennis match against Hibino.
Moyuka Uchijima vs Nao Hibino Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
M. Uchijima vs N. Hibino H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 1 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 15 | Games Won | 18 |
| 6 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 8 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 1:14:16 | Average Match Time | 1:14:16 |
| 61% (71/116) | 1st Serve % | 69% (81/118) |
| 56% (40/71) | 1st Serve Win % | 53% (43/81) |
| 38% (17/45) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (18/37) |
| 47% (7/15) | Break Pts Won % | 53% (8/15) |
| 48% (57/118) | Return Points Win % | 51% (59/116) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
M. Uchijima Recent Matches Played
N. Hibino Recent Matches Played

M. Uchijima vs N. Hibino Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58.44% (263/187) | YTD Win/Loss | 54.51% (405/338) |
| 56.16% (579/452) | Sets Win/Loss | 52.99% (903/801) |
| 52.29% (4961/4526) | Games Win/Loss | 51.53% (8017/7542) |
| 57.04% (154/116) | Hard Win/Loss | 56.75% (290/221) |
| 67.24% (78/38) | Clay Win/Loss | 45.45% (55/66) |
| 53.85% (28/24) | Indoor Hard W/L | 57.78% (26/19) |
| 25.00% (3/9) | Grass Win/Loss | 51.52% (34/32) |
| 0.21 | Aces Per Game | 0.13 |
| 962 | Aces Total | 1016 |
| 0.34 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.21 |
| 1591 | Total Double Faults | 1600 |
| 1:24:54 | Average Match Time | 1:12:44 |
| 278.01 | Average Opponent Rank | 480.95 |
| 60% (16335/27323) | 1st Serve % | 65% (25600/39216) |
| 63% (10325/16278) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (15510/25600) |
| 46% (5046/11058) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (6309/13613) |
| 47% (1605/3380) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (2275/4785) |
| 45% (12321/27322) | Return Points Win % | 45% (17644/39444) |
| 53.13% (17/15) | Slam W/L | 47.56% (39/43) |
| 57.89% (22/16) | Masters W/L | 42.42% (28/38) |
| 61.54% (8/5) | Cups W/L | 56.25% (9/7) |
| 29.82% (17/40) | Main Tour W/L | 49.05% (103/107) |
| 62.19% (176/107) | Challenger W/L | 59.41% (202/138) |
| 85.19% (23/4) | Futures W/L | 82.76% (24/5) |
| 58% (262/448) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 54% (398/731) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 40% (2/5) |
| 53% (56/106) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 57% (87/152) |
| 60% (78/131) | Deciding Set Win % | 56% (125/222) |
| 92% (233/215) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (382/329) |
| 8% (233/18) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (382/51) |
| 22% (217/48) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (361/73) |